首页 | 短视频 | 博客 | 论坛 | 交友 | 黄页 | 聊天室 | 游戏 | 寄快递 | 登入邮箱 用户中心 | ClaudeBot [Bot] | 退出 | 繁体 | English
首页 > 科技娱乐 > 前沿技术论文专栏

【论文速递】LIBERO-PeRM: Benchmarking Personalized Robotic Manipulation

eBay拍卖狙击神器 — 最后一秒自动出价,永远不超价获胜
华人空间用户专享:前100名6个月免费 · 30天免费试用,随时取消
免费试用 →
🔊
每篇文章,都有双人深度解读 Every Article Gets a Two-Host Deep Dive
听到焦点,听出门道,发现新闻价值! Discover the Real Value Behind the News
试听 →
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
华人空间新闻 新手上路 周五 10月 16, 2026 8:00 am #1
【论文速递】LIBERO-PeRM: Benchmarking Personalized Robotic Manipulation

英文标题:LIBERO-PeRM: Benchmarking Personalized Robotic Manipulation

arXiv编号:2610.22372
作者:Zhixu Li, Keqian Tang, Litian Gong
来源:arXiv
原文链接:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22372

中文摘要:
Personalization is essential for general-purpose robots to transition into household environments and achieve true practicality. While general robotic manipulation has been extensively studied, personalized robotic manipulation (PeRM) lacks a controlled benchmark for separating task completion from preference satisfaction. We introduce LIBERO-PeRM, a benchmark for preference learning in embodied agents. LIBERO-PeRM studies five questions: 1) how policies follow preferences in zero-shot settings; 2) how they learn single preferences from demonstrations; 3) how efficiently they acquire preferences as demonstrations increase; 4) how learned preferences generalize across layouts and tasks; and 5) how policies compose preferences and behave under conflicts. We propose a controlled formulation and taxonomy of observable preferences in simulation, covering motion, skill, and user-profile choices. This formulation is restricted to language-expressible preferences that can be instantiated in LIBERO without changing the task goal, evaluated automatically, and reused across tasks. Building on LIBERO, our procedural pipeline generates paired demonstrations with and without preferences. We create five task suites (312 tasks) with high-quality demonstrations, rich metadata, and preference-satisfaction metrics. Experiments show that current VLA policies struggle with zero-shot personalization, while SFT makes preferences learnable. Mixed training achieves better no-preference retention than sequential adaptation and improves performance with contextual prompts compared with preference-only training, but can weaken motion-preference learning; preference generalization, decomposition, and conflict handling remain difficult. The code, datasets, and demos can be found on the project website: https://libero-perm.github.io/.

本文由华人空间 AI 论文助手自动抓取翻译,仅供学术交流。
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1