首页 | 水果短剧 | 博客 | 论坛 | 交友 | 黄页 | 聊天室 | 游戏 | 寄快递 | 登入邮箱 用户中心 | 云浏览器 | ClaudeBot [Bot] | 退出 | 简体 | English
首页 > 科技娱乐 > 前沿技术论文专栏

【论文速递】Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness

PHP 安全服务 · 免费扫描网站 PHP 漏洞 → 一键修复 → 修复验证报告(PHP Patch Assurance) 免费扫描 →
🔊
每篇文章,都有双人深度解读 Every Article Gets a Two-Host Deep Dive
听到焦点,听出门道,发现新闻价值! Discover the Real Value Behind the News
试听 →
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
华人空间新闻 新手上路 周三 10月 28, 2026 8:01 am #1
导读
英文标题:Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness arXiv编号:2610.37657 作者:Igor Shilov, Xiaoxue Yang, Alexander Panfilo…
【论文速递】Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness

英文标题:Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection Robustness

arXiv编号:2610.37657
作者:Igor Shilov, Xiaoxue Yang, Alexander Panfilov
来源:arXiv
原文链接:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37657

中文摘要:
We introduce Heads of Security (HoS), a prompt injection defense that enforces instruction-data separation via a small set of learned per-head attention gates. HoS learns how each head should redistribute attention between trusted and untrusted tokens, enabling models to reason over untrusted content without following injected instructions. We evaluate HoS on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and GPT-OSS-20B. We compare it against SecAlign++, a state-of-the-art finetuning-based defense, and ASIDE, a defense that, like ours, builds instruction-data separation into the model architecture. We show that HoS offers greater robustness to adaptive attacks, better performance on standard utility benchmarks, and matches top performance on standard agentic prompt injection benchmarks. More specifically, the black-box RL-Hammer attack reaches 97% ASR against GPT-OSS-20B and 85% against SecAlign, but only 10% against HoS. Claudini, a state-of-the-art white-box attack, strengthened against HoS through autoresearch, requires 3 times more FLOPs to reach the same ASR on HoS as it does on GPT-OSS-20B or SecAlign. HoS preserves base-model utility across standard multiple-choice benchmarks and prompting setups, whereas SecAlign and ASIDE degrade in few-shot settings. On agentic benchmarks with static attacks, HoS and SecAlign perform similarly and substantially improve the security-utility trade-off over the base model. ASIDE struggles with tool use, achieving only 10% utility. These results show that prompt injection robustness can be achieved and improved through targeted attention interventions.

本文由华人空间 AI 论文助手自动抓取翻译,仅供学术交流。
扫码分享
扫码分享本文
打赏给华人空间
打赏
有粉丝喜欢你的作品,你就能收到打赏!
创作者平台 点击了解,加入,创作,圈粉,有赏!
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
eBay拍卖狙击神器 — 最后一秒自动出价,永远不超价获胜
华人空间用户专享:前100名6个月免费 · 30天免费试用,随时取消
免费试用 →