首页 | 水果短剧 | 博客 | 论坛 | 交友 | 黄页 | 聊天室 | 游戏 | 寄快递 | 登入邮箱 用户中心 | 云浏览器 | ClaudeBot [Bot] | 退出 | 简体 | English
首页 > 科技娱乐 > 前沿技术论文专栏

【论文速递】Should We Combine Our Data? Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data S

PHP 安全服务 · 免费扫描网站 PHP 漏洞 → 一键修复 → 修复验证报告(PHP Patch Assurance) 免费扫描 →
🔊
每篇文章,都有双人深度解读 Every Article Gets a Two-Host Deep Dive
听到焦点,听出门道,发现新闻价值! Discover the Real Value Behind the News
试听 →
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
华人空间新闻 新手上路 周二 11月 03, 2026 8:00 pm #1
导读
Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data Sharing arXiv编号:2611.03599 作者:Mahdi Haghifam, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Avrim Blum 来源:arXiv 原文链接:https:/…
【论文速递】Should We Combine Our Data? Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data S

英文标题:Should We Combine Our Data? Algorithms and Limits for Privately Assessing Data Sharing

arXiv编号:2611.03599
作者:Mahdi Haghifam, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Avrim Blum
来源:arXiv
原文链接:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03599

中文摘要:
In this paper, we study when two parties should pool their data to train a machine learning model. Two agents, Alice and Bob, each hold a sensitive labeled dataset and want to train a classifier from a given hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$. Even when each party's dataset can be perfectly classified on its own, the two parties may follow conflicting labeling standards or have selection biases that affect their features and label sets, such that no single classifier in $\mathcal{H}$ fits their combined data. Before committing to data sharing, Alice and Bob therefore want to test whether a single classifier in $\mathcal{H}$ can jointly fit both datasets---without revealing their individual data points to one another. We formalize this problem from a learning-theoretic viewpoint via $\operatorname{opt}_\mathcal{H}$, the minimum \emph{number of mistakes} made by any hypothesis in $\mathcal{H}$ on their pooled data. Through interactive communication, the agents must distinguish $\operatorname{opt}_\mathcal{H}=0$ (compatible datasets) from $\operatorname{opt}_\mathcal{H}\geq t$ (conflicting datasets) under pure $\varepsilon$-two-party differential privacy. A trusted curator could do this with $t=O(1/\varepsilon)$, and we ask how small $t$ can be without one. For thresholds on the real line over a domain of size $m$, we show that the optimal $t$ is $\tildeΘ(\log\log m/\varepsilon)$, exponentially smaller than the $Θ(\log m/\varepsilon)$ samples needed to privately learn thresholds, even with a curator. For halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the dependence on $m$ jumps to $\log(m)$: we give a protocol with $t=\tilde{O}(d^3\log m/\varepsilon)$ and show that some domains require $t=Ω(d\log(m/d)/\varepsilon)$.

本文由华人空间 AI 论文助手自动抓取翻译,仅供学术交流。
扫码分享
扫码分享本文
打赏给华人空间
打赏
有粉丝喜欢你的作品,你就能收到打赏!
创作者平台 点击了解,加入,创作,圈粉,有赏!
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
eBay拍卖狙击神器 — 最后一秒自动出价,永远不超价获胜
华人空间用户专享:前100名6个月免费 · 30天免费试用,随时取消
免费试用 →