首页 | 水果短剧 | 博客 | 论坛 | 交友 | 黄页 | 聊天室 | 游戏 | 寄快递 | 登入邮箱 用户中心 | 云浏览器 | ClaudeBot [Bot] | 退出 | 简体 | English
首页 > 科技娱乐 > 前沿技术论文专栏

【论文速递】Patient-specific rubric-based evaluation of large language models across longitu

PHP 安全服务 · 免费扫描网站 PHP 漏洞 → 一键修复 → 修复验证报告(PHP Patch Assurance) 免费扫描 →
🔊
每篇文章,都有双人深度解读 Every Article Gets a Two-Host Deep Dive
听到焦点,听出门道,发现新闻价值! Discover the Real Value Behind the News
试听 →
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
华人空间新闻 新手上路 周二 10月 27, 2026 8:00 pm #1
导读
英文标题:Patient-specific rubric-based evaluation of large language models across longitudinal cancer care arXiv编号:2610.35847 作者:Wei-Wei Zhang, Pengkai Wa…
【论文速递】Patient-specific rubric-based evaluation of large language models across longitu

英文标题:Patient-specific rubric-based evaluation of large language models across longitudinal cancer care

arXiv编号:2610.35847
作者:Wei-Wei Zhang, Pengkai Wang, Yan Li
来源:arXiv
原文链接:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35847

中文摘要:
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in specialty medicine, yet existing evaluations largely focus on isolated clinical encounters rather than tracking how clinical responsibilities evolve across a longitudinal care pathway. Here we introduce NPC-RubricBench, a phase-aware benchmark for evaluating multistage clinical reasoning across the cancer care continuum, using nasopharyngeal carcinoma as a defined disease context. Curated from longitudinal records of 405 patients across two cancer centers, the benchmark comprises 941 patient-phase units across six sequential care phases and 17,688 patient-specific atomic criteria spanning five evaluation dimensions, with each assessment strictly restricted to decision-time clinical evidence. Evaluating 30 general-purpose and medical LLMs revealed that strong diagnostic performance does not carry over to downstream care. We evaluated 30 general-purpose and medical LLMs, showing that high diagnostic performance did not translate into improved downstream care. Instead, the dominant failure modes reversed across phases. Explicit decision errors dominated anatomical staging at 48.2%, whereas decision omissions dominated initial work-up and post-treatment follow-up at 33.4% and 30.4%, respectively. In the evaluated model set, medically adapted models showed higher omission rates than general-purpose models. Moreover, varying query granularity exposes a critical specification trade-off: broad open-ended requests degrade Decision Quality across all 30 models, while more detailed, checklist-like prompts raise Decision Quality but reduce Evidence Faithfulness and Safety Adherence. Furthermore, NPC-RubricBench demonstrates that static diagnostic benchmarks are insufficient to ensure consistent clinical reliability over time, highlighting the importance of phase-adaptive safeguards in multistage medical AI.

本文由华人空间 AI 论文助手自动抓取翻译,仅供学术交流。
扫码分享
扫码分享本文
打赏给华人空间
打赏
有粉丝喜欢你的作品,你就能收到打赏!
创作者平台 点击了解,加入,创作,圈粉,有赏!
简体版 繁体版 分页: 1 / 1
eBay拍卖狙击神器 — 最后一秒自动出价,永远不超价获胜
华人空间用户专享:前100名6个月免费 · 30天免费试用,随时取消
免费试用 →